The following text is presented in the hope that we can take Psychosynthesis Typology to the next level of understanding. I have not depended solely upon Assagioli's recorded text but have intuitively developed a line of reasoning (thinking) that allows his work to continue. I have found myself reviewing theories of leadership with Assagioli's teachings in mind.This paper is an integration of several different approaches to describing human behavior. None of these classical leadership theories have a basis in Psychosynthesis but all are explained and supported by Psyc hosynthesis. While I have focussed on business aspects of Differential Psychology, it has become apparent to me that a wider view of relationships in general is appropriate.
I would appreciate any comments including what is not clear or even what you may consider to be in error.
Around 400 BC, Hippocrates, the Greek philosopher wrote of the Four Humours when describing human behavior: sanguine (strong willed), choleric (quick tempered), melancholic (gloomy) and phlegmatic (indifferent). These were observations in a society much less complex than we have today. Although they can be used to describe behavior, they are only basic observations and do not delve into the true variances in human personalities. I refer to these ancient observations to merely point out that personality differentiation has been around for a long time.
By the beginning of the 20th century, the world was becoming industrialized and conflict among people with diverse personalities was on the increase. Four pioneers of modern psychology, Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, Abraham Maslow and Roberto Assagioli, developed techniques into the causes of conflict and dysfunction in a rapidly changing world. Each followed a different path. All left a legacy of knowledge.
Assagioli is the least known of the four, however he and Jung developed lines of reasoning that provide a basis for Differential Psychology (personality profiling). Jung wrote Jung's Theory of Personality Types in 1920 which was published by Princeton University as Psychological Types in 1971 [8]. Isabel Myers and Katherine Briggs later developed Jung's Typology into a widely used behavior measuring tool, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. (MBTI.) [12]. The questionnaire for the MBTI. relates to sixteen classifications of behavior based upon four pairs of opposing characteristics. Jung wrote of three opposing descriptions of behavior (extravert-introvert, thinking-feeling and sensing-intuiting). Myers-Briggs added a fourth (judging-perceiving).
Jung believed that differences in behaviors of people are due to chosen preferences towards a particular characteristic of personal interactions. Thus, he referred to variances in personalities as functional types with either dominant or inferior characteristics. He said that people have multitude of archetypes (impersonal, mythological characters) to drive them from within but one is not more important than another. Jung also did very little work on the integration of behaviors. Assagioli disagreed with Jung in that he believed that each person has a primary force from birth with one type of behavior being dominant over the others. This primary force theory has roots in Eastern religion so it has been viewed with skepticism by the "scientific" psychology community.
Assagioli published papers for several years which formed the basis for, The Act of Will [1] and Psychosynthesis [2]. He wrote Psychosynthesis Typology [3] which describes seven categories of being (archetypes) that cause people to behave in particular, predictable ways. Jung believed behavior to be the result of preferential choice while Assagioli believed that behavior is caused by inherent instincts. Jungian Typology focuses on resultant aspects of behavior while Psychosynthesis Typology (PST) relates to the causal aspects.
At first, the subject of personality differentiation may seem quite complex. Although the underlying research and theories took several people many years to develop, it is actually simple. There are two common personality categories that I refer to as the Alpha's and the Beta's. One, Alpha, is driven by Will (survival) and the other, Beta, by Love (companionship). A third category, the Omega integrates traits of the Alpha's and the Beta's to live a "self-actualized" Participative Life Style with a high focus on purpose and people. This discussion primarily relates to the Alpha's and Beta's because these personality types are the most common.
Although each of us identifies with and displays all these types of behavior in varying degrees, one will normally be exhibited more intensely than the others. The behavior that you project to others with the highest intensity is the personality for which you will be known. I am a "Scientific" type who likes a lot of detail as you will soon learn. These descriptions can be related to interpersonal relationships in marriage, friendship, business or social settings. The "personality" that each of us projects is a function of our behavior in the presence of others. The "way" people react to one another has been the focus of my utilization of Psychosynthesis Typology.
PST principles help to explain why and how your behavior affects others. PST tools are based upon seven components which relate to each other as we project ourselves to the world in which we function. The seven behaviors (Willful, Loving, Active, Creative, Scientific, Idealistic, and Organized) and combinations thereof in varying intensities provide the basis for describing the causal aspects of harmony and conflict in relationships.
The effect of Willful behavior is readily evident. Personal financial stability and physical survival are a direct result of the application of our Will. At times, this may be at the expense of those with whom we interface. Will Types are sensor-judgers [Myers-Briggs (12)] who are extraverts at work and introverts in a social setting. They tend to be controlling in a relationship.
The dimensions of Will, its aspects, qualities and stages, are very adeptly described in The Act of Will [Assagioli (1)] where he lists the six stages of willing: Purpose, Deliberation, Decision, Affirmation, Planning, and Execution. These stages should not be taken lightly. Failure of many relationships can very often be traced to a reduction or elimination of one or more of these processes of Willing. This book is recommended reading.
For the purposes of this discussion, Life Styles are divided into four
categories:
1. Authoritarian
2. Participative
3. Facilitative
4. Permissive
These categories indicate the intensity of the application of Will and Love characteristics when interacting with other people. The concept of Will and Love as modifiers of our inherent human behaviors is key to applying PST to relationships. Will and Love are components of a complex system of social order that is evolving in both society and personal relationships as more and more individuals become aware of their nature and benefit. These components inter-relate and affect each other in positive and negative ways. They cannot easily be isolated from our dynamic actions and reactions at home, work or elsewhere. The effect of a person's behavior on others is included in a PST Life Style Model (Figure 2) as a reference for understanding and reducing conflict in personal relationships.
The utilization of Will and Love in relationships is not a new concept. Descriptions of Authoritarian (Directive/Dictatorial) and Democratic (Participative/Facilitative) behaviors have been provided from many sources as noted in the references. By studying and observing person-to-person interactions first hand, similarities among existing descriptions of behavior are evident. Guidelines are provided herein for understanding normal personality diversities, forming effective relationships and reducing conflict due to personality variances.
Authoritarian behaviors have been prevalent throughout history and until the late 1960's, it was how many individuals operated. Focus on a goal was the primary tool against which success or failure was measured. Survival was primary; concern for others was secondary. During the 1960's, a social revolution began in the western industrialized nations that brought the expression of Love to a higher level of public awareness. This change in how individuals in society interact with each other was described by Douglas McGregor [11]. He provided descriptions for Theory X and Y behavior in business. His descriptions of the way people interact with one another at work also applies to personal relationships. Theory X is Authoritarian (dictatorial) behavior. Theory Y incorporates a concern for people into decision making. Concepts include aspects of a healthy ego and self-actualization in that the needs of others are incorporated into an individual's own needs. It recognizes that once basic needs for survival (money, health, security, etc.) are met, then additional personal satisfaction is required to maintain a stable relationship. Theory Y includes two Life Style descriptions, Participative and Facilitative. A Permissive (low Love and low Will) Life Style, which can be effective in limited situations, is not addressed by this model.
Authoritarian, Participative, Facilitative and Permissive Life Styles are exhibited in varying degrees. A person living an Authoritarian Life Style displays a high intensity of Will and they are goal oriented. Their behavior ranges from dictatorial to directive. A person living a Participative Life Style allows others to be involved in decision making processes. Their behavior ranges from directive to altruistic. Persons living a Facilitative Life Style allows others to reach decisions by majority agreement. They act to guide and not direct the path of other people. Their behavior ranges from humanistic to harmonious. Persons living a Permissive Life Style provide little if any input to others. Their behavior ranges from harmonious to submissive.
In the past, these four styles were based primarily upon the intensity of Willful behavior. The concept of applying a Loving concern for people in addition to a Willful concern for purpose is shown by a Four Matrix Grid, Figure 1. Although this model was developed for business relationships, it is applicable to life in general.
The PST Life Styles Survey provided herein includes the method for determining a location on the four grid matrix. An example is included in Appendix B.
| High | 84 | * | |||
| Concern | * | FACILITATIVE | PARTICIPATIVE | ||
| for | 42 | * | |||
| People | * | PERMISSIVE | AUTHORITARIAN | ||
| Low | 0 | * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | ||
| 0 | 42 | 84 | |||
| Low | Concern for Purpose | High | |||
| Figure 1. People-Purpose Life Style Model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The characteristics of behavior are divided into two tables to describe variances. Table 1 is indicative of Alpha persons where a goal is important. Table 2 is representative of Beta persons who are more people oriented. The information in Tables 1 and 2 is the basis of Differential Psychology awareness training in that it provides the descriptions of how individuals are perceived by those with whom they contact. For example, if you behave like a dictator, a strong willed manipulator, a forceful rule maker, or a person who demands order in the organization, you will be perceived as Authoritarian. Similar correlations exist for the remainder of the descriptions in Table 1 and those in Table 2. The survey questionnaire in Appendix A measures these variations in behavior and relates them to Life Styles.
***************************************************************
Table 1. - Variances in the 1-3-5-7 Alpha Personality
***************************************************************
(1)High Willful behavior with an Authoritarian Life Style - Dictator; makes demands on others; unrealistic.
(3)High Active behavior with an Authoritarian Life Style - Manipulates; ignores suggestions.
(5)High Scientific behavior with an Authoritarian Life Style - Enforces rules; disregards intuition.
(7)High Organized behavior with an Authoritarian Life Style - Focuses on order in their life; bureaucratic.
**************************************************************
(1)High Willful behavior with a Participative Life Style - Directive; allows input but makes final decisions.
(3)High Active behavior with a Participative Life Style - Strategic planner; active participant in challenging events.
(5)High Scientific behavior with a Participative Life Style - Seeks facts; does not get emotionally involved.
(7)High Organized behavior with a Participative Life Style - Follows rules; likes detail and administrative duties.
**************************************************************
(1)High Willful behavior with a Facilitative Life Style - Firm guidance towards their own personal goals.
(3)High Active behavior with a Facilitative Life Style - Indirectly manipulates for the good of the relationship.
(5)High Scientific behavior with a Facilitative Life Style - Suggests technical direction; likes to make lists.
(7)High Organized behavior with a Facilitative Life Style - Gets processes in order; good at planning and coordinating.
**************************************************************
(1)High Willful behavior with a Permissive Life Style - Self-repressed; ignores suggestions.
(3)High Active behavior with a Permissive Life Style - Busily inefficient.
(5)High Scientific behavior with a Permissive Life Style - Loner; likes books and data; ignores people.
(7)High Organized behavior with a Permissive Life Style - Delegates everything; does not check on progress.
**************************END OF TABLE 1*****************************
Individuals with Alpha personalities are purpose (goal) oriented. The
intensity of their Will directly affects their Life Style. A high, overly
developed Will in an Alpha person leads to an Authoritarian Life Style. They
show little emotion towards people but can become very attached to things.
They become more democratic in their behavior by suppressing their Will.
Beta people (Table 2) exhibit a high concern for people, animals and the environment. They may even display an unusually high regard for life in all forms. Their personalities often determine their Life Style which is usually Facilitative. They evolve to a more democratic Life Style by increasing Willful behavior. As they exert their Will, they become more Participative. If the Will of a Beta person is overly low, they tend towards a Permissive (submissive) Life Style.
***************************************************************
Table 2. - Variances in the 2-4-6 Beta Personality
***************************************************************
(2)High Love behavior with an Authoritarian Life Style - Exhibits tough love characteristics; firm but caring in dealing with others; realistic.
(4)High Creative/Artistic behavior with an Authoritarian Life Style - Instigates conflict; dramatic when deal with emotional issues.
(6)High Idealistic/Devotiional behavior with an Authoritarian Life Style - Focuses on global purposes; preaches.
**************************************************************
(2)High Love behavior with a Participative Life Style - Consoling; personable; becomes emotionally involved with others easily.
(4)High Creative/Artistic behavior with a Participative Life Style - Negotiates; likes to resolve conflict.
(6)High Idealistic/Devotional behavior with a Participative Life Style - Guides towards higher principles.
**************************************************************
(2)High Love behavior with a Facilitative Life Style - Guides others towards a greater concern for people.
(4)High Creative/Artistic behavior with a Facilitative Life Style - Guides to a middle ground position when conflict occurs.
(6)High Idealistic/Devotional behavior with a Facilitative Life Style - Provides intermediate goals as a means to an end.
**************************************************************
(2)High Love behavior with a Permissive Life Style - Obedient; follows instructions.
(4)High Creative/Artistic behavior with a Permissive Life Style - Cruises along; disagrees with no one.
(6)High Idealistic/Devotional behavior with a Permissive Life Style - Unquestioning devotion; a follower.
*************************END OF TABLE 2***********************
Each of us varies our behavioral characteristics to fit a given situation.
For some, this skill comes by trial and error over time and many people
develop it without a knowledge of Differential Psychology. For others, it is
a natural process of learning and growth throughout life. Personality
related behavioral problems are easily recognized. The determination of a
cause and the implementation of solutions are where most personality models
fall short. By increasing your knowledge of natural human behaviors, you can
determine your natural (true) style within the framework of this model and
predict affects your behavior may have on others.
Husbands and wives, friends, business associates, and many other personal interactions can be a source of conflict. Because this discussion is directed towards relationships, person-to-person interfacing has been included as examples of potential personality conflicts (and harmonies) based upon inherent characteristics of behavior. Tables 3 through 9 describe normal reactions between individuals with diverse personalities when someone is exhibiting a democratic (Facilitative/ Participative) Life Style and their basic needs are being met. Variations in the style or activation of survival behaviors will alter the relationship and the resultant actions and reactions listed.
| Personality Type | Actions and Reactions |
|---|---|
| 1) WILLFUL | ARGUMENTATIVE (Wants own way.) |
| 2) LOVING | SUBMISSIVE (Needs to please.) |
| 3) ACTIVE/PRACTICAL | CONFLICT; STRESS (Goes in too many directions.) |
| 4) CREATIVE/ARTISTIC | STRESSED (Does not like orders.) |
| 5) SCIENTIFIC | CONFUSED (Needs detailed direction.) |
| 6) IDEALISTIC/DEVOTIONAL | QUESTIONS ORDERS (Dislikes commands.) |
| 7) ORGANIZED | COMPLIANT (Likes to get assignments.) |
| Table 3. - Willful (Alpha-1) Person-to-Person Relationships | |
| Personality Type | Actions and Reactions |
|---|---|
| 1) WILLFUL | TAKES CONTROL (Gets own way.) |
| 2) LOVING | SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP (Both need to please.) |
| 3) ACTIVE/PRACTICAL | UNCONTROLLED BEHAVIOR (Goes in many directions.) |
| 4) CREATIVE/ARTISTIC | INEFFICIENT (Needs direction; gets love.) |
| 5) SCIENTIFIC | TAKES OWN PATH (Bores and ignores other person.) |
| 6) IDEALISTIC/DEVOTIONAL | ACCEPTS ORDERS (If beliefs are same as other person.) |
| 7) ORGANIZED | COMPLIANT (Does not ask for help.) |
| Table 4. - Loving (Beta-2) Person-to-Person Relationships | |
| Personality Type | Actions and Reactions |
|---|---|
| 1) WILLFUL | CONFUSED (Wants to be in charge.) |
| 2) LOVING | MISDIRECTED (Does not understand multiple direction.) |
| 3) ACTIVE/PRACTICAL | ACTIVITY (Goes in several directions.) |
| 4) CREATIVE/ARTISTIC | STRESSED (High-low emotions caused by redirection.) |
| 5) SCIENTIFIC | ANALYTICAL (Develops details; may not finish project.) |
| 6) IDEALISTIC/DEVOTIONAL | ENTHUSIASTIC (Activity generates ideas.) |
| 7) ORGANIZED | CONFUSED (Needs to finish one project at a time.) |
| Table 5. - Active/Practical (Alpha-3) Person-to-Person Relationships | |
| Personality Type | Actions and Reactions |
|---|---|
| 1) WILLFUL | CONFUSED (Cannot focus on a moving target.) |
| 2) LOVING | DEPENDENT (Gives love; gets confusion.) |
| 3) ACTIVE/PRACTICAL | CONFLICT; STRESS (Goes in too many directions.) |
| 4) CREATIVE/ARTISTIC | WASTES TIME (Neither can plan a schedule.) |
| 5) SCIENTIFIC | FRUSTRATED (Just gets going, then is redirected.) |
| 6) IDEALISTIC/DEVOTIONAL | STANDS BACK (Good for new idea development.) |
| 7) ORGANIZED | STRESSED (Too many conflicting directions.) |
| Table 6. - Creative/Artistic (Beta-4) Person-to-Person Relationships | |
In relationships, they may tend to be manipulative. Successful Creative
types with a strong Will have learned how to effectively use conflict to
increase harmony. They disrupt a process, usually stirring up emotions, and
then return later to indirectly apologize by harmonizing divergent points of
view.
| Personality Type | Actions and Reactions |
|---|---|
| 1) WILLFUL | STRESSED (Too much detailed direction.) |
| 2) LOVING | SUBMISSIVE (Gets no emotional support.) |
| 3) ACTIVE/PRACTICAL | COMPLIANT (Likes technical issues, not detail.) |
| 4) CREATIVE/ARTISTIC | CONFUSED (Tries too hard to please.) |
| 5) SCIENTIFIC | "BUDDIES" (Like to discuss technical subjects.) |
| 6) IDEALISTIC/DEVOTIONAL | SUSPICIOUS (Watchful of each other.) |
| 7) ORGANIZED | COMPLIANT (Likes detailed assignments.) |
| Table 7. - Scientific (Alpha-5) Person-to-Person Relationships | |
| Personality Type | Actions and Reactions |
|---|---|
| 1) WILLFUL | RESPECTFUL (Recognizes authority.) |
| 2) LOVING | CARING (Gets high level emotional support.) |
| 3) ACTIVE/PRACTICAL | CAUTIOUS (Evaluates other person constantly.) |
| 4) CREATIVE/ARTISTIC | FOCUSED ACTIVITY (Ideals help to focus goals.) |
| 5) SCIENTIFIC | CONFUSED (Cannot relate to other person's perspective.) |
| 6) IDEALISTIC/DEVOTIONAL | DEVOTED (If beliefs are the same.) |
| 7) ORGANIZED | COMPLIANT (Idolizes other person.) |
| Table 8. - Idealistic (Beta-6) Person-to-Person Relationships | |
At a low Love, high Will level, Beta-6 persons are very impersonal and
extremely focused on ideals. They believe that it is their duty to persuade
others to adopt their beliefs.
| Personality Type | Actions and Reactions |
|---|---|
| 1) WILLFUL | COMPLIANT (If goals are accepted by others.) |
| 2) LOVING | MOTIVATED (If emotions are not involved.) |
| 3) ACTIVE/PRACTICAL | RESTRICTED (Likes periodic disorder.) |
| 4) CREATIVE/ARTISTIC | STRESSED (Cannot be organized for very long.) |
| 5) SCIENTIFIC | COMPLIANT (Needs detailed direction.) |
| 6) IDEALISTIC/DEVOTIONAL | RESTRICTED (Likes to develop own system.) |
| 7) ORGANIZED | "BUDDIES" (Organization breeds organization.) |
| Table 9. - Organized (Alpha-7) Person-to-Person Relationships | |
Tables 3 through 9 are provided as a basis for analyzing possible conflict
between individuals identified with opposing behaviors. Conflict can be
useful if guided towards a positive outcome or it can be destructive if it
causes unresolved stress in a relationship. There are no hard and fast
guidelines as to how much conflict fuels creativity and how much causes
disruption. Techniques for resolving conflict must be developed on an
individual basis over time. Most successful people develop workable methods
to resolve conflict. Mentors can be very helpful in this area.
| High | 84 | * | HUMANISTIC | POSSESSIVE | ALTRUISTIC |
| * | |||||
| * | FACILITATIVE | PARTICIPATIVE | |||
| Concern | * | LOVE | |||
| for | 42 | * | HARMONIOUS | STRATEGIC | DIRECTIVE |
| People | * | ||||
| * | PERMISSIVE | AUTHORITARIAN | |||
| Low | 7 | * | SUBMISSIVE | MANIPULATIVE | DICTATORIAL |
| * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | ||||
| 7 | 42 | 84 | |||
| Low | Concern for Purpose | High | |||
| Low | WILL | High | |||
| Figure 2. - The PST Life Styles Model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Figure 2 is scaled from 7 through 84 which indicates the intensity of a
person's behavior towards goals and people as measured by the attached Types
Personality Profile Survey [Holt (7)]. The intersection of the two scores
for Will and Love locates the Life Style description that is projected to
those with whom we interact.
Methods to determine Life Styles presented in past literature do not adequately discuss causes of behavior nor are guidelines provided to prevent and reduce conflict. This Model provides a basis for explaining behavioral differences and increases awareness of potential personality conflicts. When compared to previous models, the Life Styles Model integrates previous models into a cohesive guide for managing one's own Life Style. Will (concern for purpose) and Love (concern for people) are at the core of the Life Styles Model.
Psychosynthesis Typology is based upon defining and integrating behaviors so that we may communicate better with the many different persons we encounter. Assagioli in his book, The Act of Will [1], notes that the synthesis (integration) of the aspects of Will and Love is a challenge for all of us. The measurement and correlation of this integration is represented by adding an intensity scale of Will and Love in the Life Styles Model shown in Table 10.
| Four Matrix Model | Psychosynthesis Typology Model | PST Will | PST Love |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participative | Atruistic | High | High |
| Directive | High | Medium | |
| Authoritarian | Dictatorial | High | Low |
| Manipulative | Medium | Low | |
| Strategic | Medium | Medium | |
| Possessive | Medium | High | |
| Facilitative | Humanistic | Low | High |
| Harmonious | Low | Medium | |
| Permissive | Submissive | Low | Low |
| Table 10. - Correlation of the PST Life Style Model with Psychosynthesis Typology | |||
The PST Life Style Model incorporates the four general Life Style categories
of Authoritarian, Participative, Facilitative and Permissive into an expanded
description of behavior and personality interactions. The Four Matrix Model
is a basic building block to which I have added the midpoint of the grid
which is "Strategic" behavior, a valuable function and often misused
(manipulative) behavior in many relationships.

URL= http://two.not2.org/psychosynthesis/articles/rmoore.htm
Last revised: January 13, 2001